None of those with any interest in built heritage were in the least surprized when the final Bray Heritage report recommended the creation of an Heritage District out of Old Sydenham Ward. In fact, I think that most of us would have tumbled off our chairs had it not done so.
It is a fine report, well-researched, with quality content.
However, after thirty years watching and participating in heritage in this neck of the woods, perhaps I may be forgiven a deep sigh. All of our efforts, beginning with the redoubtable Margaret Angus, and continuing with efforts of well-connected locals like Jim Bennett have resulted in so few victories.
Ontario Street is a case in point. With the old industrial structures no more, the City had the opportunity to protect the interface between Old Sydenham Ward and the Lake for the people and instead we have a wall of mundane towers and acres of concrete. In my opinion, this was totally unnecessary as the old city is still relatively small with lots of land north and west which could have been used for high density development. Some of those parcels have spectacular views. That land is also close to the 401 corridor and there was the opportunity to plan properly for the automobile traffic which high density always generates (no matter what the developers tell you).
The planning objection to moving the high density north seemed to be the cost of extending utilities. I wonder how much the recent sewage spills and flooding of lower Princess street properties had to do with the huge impact of all those new, downtown towers on aging urban infrastructure? But I digress.
My point is that, despite great public input and energy in the past, we have just not been able to stop the inexorable intrusion of very commonplace late twentieth century forms into the unique limestone part of the city. I don’t care what the architect’s name is, most of the newer stuff is functional vernacular. I would not drive to Kingston to look at, nor in my opinion would anyone else.
We can successfully persuade home-owners to select sympathetic surface elements and restore, rather than replace, Victorian fenestration, but what good is that going to do when an unrelieved red brick wall or a monolith looms at you from the foot of the road?
I need persuading that the City would not once again fold within days of an application from a developer to push back the boundaries of protection… “just a little”, “just a block or so”. The usual wheeze is to quietly acquire a number of buildings on the edge of the district, allow them to run down and then argue that they aren’t worth saving and never should have been included in the district. Will the City stand up to this? Oh, I would so like to think so, but based on my experience, I think not. All a developer has to do is claim that the City is unfairly standing in the way of someone making a whacking return on investment, and the heritage folk are trampled in the rush to compromise.
Thus, our irreplacable heritage assets are continually eroded away.
The Bray Report acknowledges this in Recommendation 8:
“It is recommended that the City initiate a parallel process to that of the current study to address issues of cultural heritage resource management. The proposed process should have a mandate to establish robust cultural heritage programs with sufficient capacity to address the current Provincial heritage policies and the resultant increased workload.”
Note the word, “robust”. I wonder how that survived to make it into the final report?
The Bray Report is worth reading and contains some splendid photographs. The City has posted it so you can read it at http://www.cityofkingston.ca/pdf/culture/heritage/SydenhamHeritageArea_FinalReport.pdf
Being my cheeky self, though, I will comment that we could have saved the Heritage Committee a good deal of time and money. Should Sydenham Ward be an heritage district? Yep. Now someone please get busy and figure out how we can finally protect our limestone identity, before it becomes more appropriate to call ourselves ‘the concrete jungle’.